Discover

Immanuel Kant

Personal Information

Born April 22, 1724
Died February 12, 1804 (79 years old)
Königsberg, Kingdom of Prussia
Also known as: KANT, IMMANUEL, 1724-1804., Immanual Kant
159 books
4.1 (27)
630 readers

Description

Immanuel Kant was an 18th-century German philosopher from the Prussian city of Königsberg. Kant was the last influential philosopher of modern Europe in the classic sequence of the theory of knowledge during the Enlightenment beginning with thinkers John Locke, George Berkeley, and David Hume. Kant created a new perspective in philosophy which had widespread influences on philosophy continuing through to the 21st century. He published important works on epistemology, as well as works relevant to religion, law, and history. One of his most prominent works is the Critique of Pure Reason, an investigation into the limitations and structure of reason itself. It encompasses an attack on traditional metaphysics and epistemology, and highlights Kant's own contribution to these areas. The other main works of his maturity are the Critique of Practical Reason, which concentrates on ethics, and the Critique of Judgment, which investigates aesthetics and teleology.

Books

Newest First

Essays

Jeremy Collier, Umberto Eco, H. I. D. Ryder, Arthur Penrhyn Stanley, Walter Kasper, Béla Bartók, Clement Mansfield Ingleby, John Fiske, John Dalberg-Acton, 1st Baron Acton, Jean-Luc Nancy, Michael Pye, Octavio Paz, Sayyid Aḥmad K̲h̲ān̲, Joseph Addison, Algirdas Julien Greimas, Евгений Иванович Замятин, Henry F. (Henry Francis) Pelham, Arthur Christopher Benson, Grant, Percy Stickney, Charles Carroll Everett, Jean François Lyotard, Herbert Spencer, Raymond Williams, William Hazlitt, Giorgio Agamben, Alfred Kerr, Aleksandr Aleksandrovich Blok, William Butler Yeats, William Graham Sumner, Allen Tate, James Beattie, J. H. Plumb, William Godwin, Francis Bacon, Henry David Thoreau, Henry Thomas Buckle, Arthur Schopenhauer, Herman Friedrich Grimm, John Addington Symonds, James Hadley, James Laughlin, Joseph Isaac Schneersohn, Irving Howe, E. M. W. Tillyard, Benjamin Rush, Plutarch, Morton Feldman, Simone Weil, Ralph Waldo Emerson, Howard Zinn, Ellen Key, Salisbury, Robert Cecil marquess of, J. Logie Robertson, Oliver Goldsmith, Thomas Henry Huxley, Arnold Zweig, Hugh Miller, Mackenzie, Morell Sir, George Orwell, Bing Xin, Roland Barthes, Errico Malatesta, George John Romanes, Parsons, Theophilus, Alice Meynell, Alejo Carpentier, Charles Baudelaire, Jacques Barzun, James Huneker, Thomas Paine, Thomas Merton, Jean-Paul Sartre, Montaigne, Michel de, David Hume, Paul Valéry, Félix Guattari, Wilhelm Max Wundt, Christopher Hill, Shen, Congwen, Italo Calvino, Robert Morgan, James Martineau, Abūlkalām Āzād, Friedrich Schiller, Rosemond Tuve, René Descartes, Immanuel Kant, Joseph Alois Schumpeter, Carl Gustav Jung, John Henry Newman, Thomas De Quincey, Virginia Woolf, Matthew Arnold, Frederic William Henry Myers, Ernst Troeltsch, Martin Buber, Hermann Bahr, Thomas Mann, Charles Augustin Sainte-Beuve, Jonathan Franzen, Samuel Johnson, Anscombe, G. E. M., Charles Lamb, George Brimley, John Abercrombie, Thomas Monro, Hubert Bland
0.0 (0)
1

Correspondence

Montagu, Mary Wortley Lady, Gertrude Stein, Hugh MacDiarmid, Yonatan Netanyahu, Théodore de Bèze, Guy Debord, John Dalberg-Acton, 1st Baron Acton, Paul Celan, Hector Berlioz, Dylan Thomas, Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart, Stéphane Mallarmé, Delmore Schwartz, Theodor W. Adorno, Vanessa Bell, Jean Leclercq, Erik Satie, Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz, Cyprian Norwid, Saint Catherine of Siena, John Conduitt, Wen, Yiduo, Antonio Baldini, John Crowe Ransom, William Pitt Earl of Chatham, Maria Celeste Galilei, Henry III King of France, Xu, Zhimo, M. Basil Pennington, Pietro Aretino, Max Frisch, Philip Dormer Stanhope, 4th Earl of Chesterfield, Zongtang Zuo, Maud Gonne, Paul Gauguin, William Gilmore Simms, Laurence Sterne, Saint Bernard of Clairvaux, Aldo Palazzeschi, Gregorio Mayans y Siscar, Sean O'Casey, Henry David Thoreau, Kingsley Amis, Richard Watson Gilder, Francis de Sales, François-René de Chateaubriand, Jean Dubuffet, Marianne Moore, Lloyd James Austin, Roy, M. N., Charles Victor de Bonstetten, Belgrano, Manuel, Gustav Radbruch, Edward Bond, Olive Schreiner, J. W. Johnston, Yu, Dafu, Charles Sumner, Edvard Grieg, Claude Debussy, Ludwig van Beethoven, Photius I Saint, Patriarch of Constantinople, Gershom Scholem, Gustav Mahler, Harry S. Truman, Saint Jerome, Claudio Monteverdi, Voltaire Foundation, José Martí, Zeng, Guofan, Sigmund Freud, Francis Poulenc, Cicero, Anna Freud, Jonathan Swift, Philipp Melanchthon, Sir Leslie Stephen, André Gide, Binyamin Netanyahu, Tao, Xingzhi, Paula Modersohn-Becker, Hart Crane, Giacomo Meyerbeer, Hügel, Friedrich Freiherr von, Carossa, Hans, Narcissa Prentiss Whitman, Arthur Hugh Clough, Clara Schumann, Saint Cyprian, Bishop of Carthage, Sir Walter Alexander Raleigh, Felix Mendelssohn, Hester Lynch Piozzi, Joseph de Maistre, William Blake, Immanuel Kant, George Santayana, Giuseppe Tornatore, Lei Fu, Saint Bede the Venerable, Germaine de Staël, William Makepeace Thackeray, Britten, Benjamin, Amos Bronson Alcott, Thomas Percy, Roger Chartier, Frida Kahlo, Matthew Arnold, George III King of Great Britain, John Wilson Croker, Federico García Lorca, Ferruccio Busoni, Gabriel Faure
2.0 (1)
1

Prolegomena

5.0 (1)
23

"Kant is the central figure of modern philosophy. He sought to rebuild philosophy from the ground up, and he succeeded in permanently changing its problems and methods. This new, revised edition of the Prolegomena, which is the best introduction to the theoretical side of his philosophy, presents his thought clearly by paying careful attention to his original language. Also included are selections from the Critique of Pure Reason, which fill out and explicate some of Kant's central arguments (including famous sections of the Schematism and Analogies), and in which Kant himself explains his special terminology. The first reviews of the Critique, to which Kant responded in the Prolegomena, are included in this revised edition. The volume is completed by a historical and philosophical introduction, explanatory notes, a chronology and a guide to further reading."--Jacket.

Immanuel Kant's Kritik der Urtheilskraft

0.0 (0)
0

Book digitized by Google from the library of Harvard University and uploaded to the Internet Archive by user tpb.

The metaphysical elements of ethics

0.0 (0)
0

If there exists on any subject a philosophy (that is, a system of rational knowledge based on concepts), then there must also be for this philosophy a system of pure rational concepts, independent of any condition of intuition, in other words, a metaphysic. It may be asked whether metaphysical elements are required also for every practical philosophy, which is the doctrine of duties, and therefore also for Ethics, in order to be able to present it as a true science (systematically), not merely as an aggregate of separate doctrines (fragmentarily). As regards pure jurisprudence, no one will question this requirement; for it concerns only what is formal in the elective will, which has to be limited in its external relations according to laws of freedom; without regarding any end which is the matter of this will. Here, therefore, deontology is a mere scientific doctrine (doctrina scientiae).Now in this philosophy (of ethics) it seems contrary to the idea of it that we should go back to metaphysical elements in order to make the notion of duty purified from everything empirical (from every feeling) a motive of action. For what sort of notion can we form of the mighty power and herculean strength which would be sufficient to overcome the vice-breeding inclinations, if Virtue is to borrow her "arms from the armoury of metaphysics," which is a matter of speculation that only few men can handle? Hence all ethical teaching in lecture rooms, pulpits, and popular books, when it is decked out with fragments of metaphysics, becomes ridiculous. But it is not, therefore, useless, much less ridiculous, to trace in metaphysics the first principles of ethics; for it is only as a philosopher that anyone can reach the first principles of this conception of duty, otherwise we could not look for either certainty or purity in the ethical teaching. To rely for this reason on a certain feeling which, on account of the effect expected from it, is called moral, may, perhaps, even satisfy the popular teacher, provided he desires as the criterion of a moral duty to consider the problem: "If everyone in every case made your maxim the universal law, how could this law be consistent with itself?" But if it were merely feeling that made it our duty to take this principle as a criterion, then this would not be dictated by reason, but only adopted instinctively and therefore blindly.But in fact, whatever men imagine, no moral principle is based on any feeling, but such a principle is really nothing else than an obscurely conceived metaphysic which inheres in every man's reasoning faculty; as the teacher will easily find who tries to catechize his pupils in the Socratic method about the imperative of duty and its application to the moral judgement of his actions. The mode of stating it need not be always metaphysical, and the language need not necessarily be scholastic, unless the pupil is to be trained to be a philosopher. But the thought must go back to the elements of metaphysics, without which we cannot expect any certainty or purity, or even motive power in ethics.