A resounding tinkle
More from FABER PAPER COVERED EDITIONS
#3
Mountolive
Ask the Fellows WHO cut the Hay. With Decorations by Thomas Bewick
The classic anthology.
Conscience of the King
Sappho: a play in verse
Literary essays of Ezra Pound
A resounding tinkle
Haute surveillance
Poems, 1950-1966
God was in Christ
The translations of Ezra Pound
The story of the Crusades, 1097-1291
archy and mehitabel
Notes Towards the Definition of Culture
All that fall
The poetry of W.B. Yeats
A choice of Byron's verse
The Hot Gates
The palm-wine drinkard and his dead palm-wine tapster in the Dead's Town
A choice of Christina Rossetti's verse
The Pisan cantos
Pincher Martin
The ten principal Upanishads
Selected poems, 1938-1968
Nunquam
The true voice of feeling
London 2000
Journey to a war
History in English words
The dog beneath the skin; or, Where is Francis?
In the forest
The three royal monkeys, or the three mulla-mulgars
Essays in literary criticism: particular studies
James Joyce: a critical introduction
The Chimneys of Green Knowe
Peacock pie, a book of rhymes
The autobiography of William Cobbett
Positives
The confidential clerk
Education Through Art
An outline of English painting
The new architecture and the Bauhaus
The whole armour and The secret ladder
The illustrated Salar the salmon
Feather woman of the jungle
Modern magic manual
Here comes everbody
Chaucer
The Colossus and Other Poems
Minsik readers
0.0
0 ratings
Other platforms
0.0
0 ratings
74
PAGES~1h 14min
READING TIMEEnglish
LANGUAGE Categories
Description
N.F. Simpson, whose work includes 'One Way Pendulum', led the twentieth century British Absurdist movement. His first play, 'A Resounding Tinkle', was one of the winners in the Observer play competition in 1957. The 'incessant ambush of non-sequiturs', as Kenneth Tynan described it, is a gloriously comic revelation of the absurdity of every day life. 'A Resounding Tinkle' was revived with the sketch 'Gladly Otherwise' at the Donmar Warehouse in July 2007.
Detailed Ratings
0.0Emotional Impact
No ratings yet
0.0Intellectual Depth
No ratings yet
0.0Writing Quality
No ratings yet
0.0Rereadability
No ratings yet
0.0Pacing
No ratings yet
0.0Readability
No ratings yet
0.0Plot Complexity
No ratings yet
0.0Humor
No ratings yet