Discover
Sep 25, 1929 — Aug 28, 1998· 68 yrs

LANGUAGE · RHETORIC

Jim W. Corder

10
BOOKS
0.0
AVG RATING (0)
0
READERS

MINNEAPOLIS (AP) -- There is a considerable buzz among New Testament scholars over the discovery of a near-complete Greek manuscript to the book of the Bible called Romans. The manuscript is similar to others, but is the first known manuscript to mirror the Today's New International Version (TNIV) in its use of inclusive language.

— from Yonder, 1998

Most acclaimed

#2

Contemporary writing

0.0 (0)
#1

A postmodern scrapbook

0.0 (0)

"Symbols of Selfhood - of emotional/psychic healing and wholeness, of reconciliation between Corder-the-child and Corder-the-man - lie scattered throughout: buried tins, baseball gloves, West Texas sunsets, hill sides, mesquite trees, ghost towns, dirt roads all take on archetypal meaning, putting the narrator in touch with the Jungian "Self" or Soul. Of particular note in Corder's lifelong Soul-questing is his struggle to love - to rightly value the "anima" or archetypal feminine; he expresses this struggle through dream imagery and fragments of memory, including lost photographs. But of all the markers of Corder's Soul-questing, the most poignant is his last: his description of his grandmother's quilt-making, whose intricate (yet homemade) patterns express the true American folk-mandala, symbolic of psychic wholeness."--Jacket.

#3

Yonder

1998

0.0 (0)

This is a look at men, women, and the life of the world we share. A large part of the motivation from this piece stems from a paradox, or at least an oddity. When a feminist takes a position, she is quite often articulate, and can give clear and cogent arguments why feminism or something close to it is needed for the well-being of women (and perhaps men). By contrast, people who disagree with feminism on principle are rarely so articulate: while they may quote the Bible, they so rarely articulate their "why?" that often it is not only feminists who may have never heard why a traditional position has an inner logic and a beating heart that is not only coherent, but is meant for the benefit of women as well as men. (Few feminists, egalitarians, or complementarians have seen this position clearly explained.) In fact, those who disagree with feminism may not have heard any more articulate of an explanation than many feminists! This isn't just unfortunate for complementarians; egalitarians and feminists may not really benefit from such an arrangement either. The pieces in this volume are connected, each in its own way, to an effort to articulate precisely what is almost never explained even by people who hold it on a deep level. A quote: Interlocutor What would you say to, "A woman's place is in the House--and in the Senate!"? Articulate Qualitarian Well, if we're talking about disrespectful, misogysnistic... Wait a minute... Let me respond to the intention behind your question. Do you know the Bible story about the Woman at the Well? Interlocutor Yes! It's one of my favorite stories. Articulate Qualitarian Do you know its cultural context?

Books

Newest First